Control Flow Nodes

Available Control Flow Nodes:

Router Node - Route execution based on condition matching with multiple named paths
Decision Node - LLM-powered intelligent routing based on natural language criteria
Human-in-the-Loop Node - Pause execution and request a human decision before proceeding

Router Node

The Router Node evaluates a condition and routes pipeline execution to one of multiple named paths. It uses template-based conditions (similar to Jinja2 syntax) to determine which route to take, with a default fallback route if no conditions match.

Purpose Use the Router Node to:

Route execution to different paths based on state variable values
Implement branching logic with multiple named routes
Evaluate complex conditions using template syntax
Provide fallback behavior with default output
Create multi-path workflows based on data conditions
Create loops and iterative execution by routing back to previous nodes

Parameters

Parameter	Purpose	Type Options & Examples
Condition	Define the conditional logic that determines which route to take	Syntax: Template syntax (Jinja2-like) Operators: `{% if condition %}` - Start conditional block `{% elif condition %}` - Alternative condition `{% else %}` - Fallback condition `{% endif %}` - End conditional block State Variables: Use variable names directly (e.g., `input`, `status`, `priority`) Filters: `\|lower`, `\|upper`, `in` operator for substring matching Example: `\{% if 'approved' in input\|lower %\}` ArticlePublisher `\{% elif 'finish' in input\|lower or 'complete' in input\|lower %\}` END `\{% endif %\}`
Routes	Define the named paths (node IDs) that the router can select	Configuration: List of node IDs that correspond to the route names returned by the condition Example: `- ArticlePublisher` `- END` Important: Route names in the condition must exactly match node IDs in the Routes list
Input	Specify which state variables the Router node reads for condition evaluation	Default states: `input`, `messages` Custom states: Any defined state variables Example: `- input` `- status` `- user_type`
Default Output	Specify the fallback route if no conditions in the Router match	Options: Select a node ID from available nodes in the pipeline Example: `ContentModerator` Fallback Behavior: If the condition doesn’t return any route name, execution goes to Default Output
Interrupt Before	Pause pipeline execution before the Router node executes	Enabled / Disabled
Interrupt After	Pause pipeline execution after the Router node for inspection	Enabled / Disabled

Route names in the condition must exactly match node IDs in the pipeline. Case sensitivity matters: “ArticlePublisher” ≠ “article_publisher”.

YAML Configuration

state:
  input:
    type: str
    value: ''
  messages:
    type: list
entry_point: Router 1
nodes:
  - id: Router 1
    type: router
    condition: |2-
          {% if 'approved' in input|lower %}
          ArticlePublisher
          {% elif 'finish' in input|lower or 'complete' in input|lower %}
          END
          {% endif %}
    input:
      - input
    routes:
      - ArticlePublisher
      - ContentModerator
      - END
    default_output: ContentModerator
  - id: ArticlePublisher
    type: toolkit
    toolkit_name: publishing_toolkit
    tool: publish_article
    input:
      - input
      - messages
    output:
      - messages
    input_mapping:
      article_content:
        type: variable
        value: input
      status:
        type: fixed
        value: published
    structured_output: false
    transition: END
  - id: ContentModerator
    type: llm
    prompt:
      type: string
      value: Review content for policy compliance and quality standards
    input:
      - input
      - messages
    output:
      - messages
    input_mapping:
      system:
        type: fixed
        value: You are a content moderator checking for policy violations and quality issues
      task:
        type: fstring
        value: 'Review this content: {input}'
      chat_history:
        type: variable
        value: messages
    structured_output: false
    transition: END

Jinja Syntax Examples

The Router Node uses Jinja2-like template syntax for condition evaluation. Here are common patterns:String Matching:

{% if 'keyword' in input|lower %}
NodeA
{% endif %}

Multiple Conditions with elif:

{% if priority == 'high' %}
UrgentHandler
{% elif priority == 'medium' %}
NormalHandler
{% elif priority == 'low' %}
LowPriorityHandler
{% else %}
DefaultHandler
{% endif %}

Logical Operators:

{% if status == 'approved' and priority == 'high' %}
FastTrackPublisher
{% elif status == 'approved' or status == 'pending' %}
ReviewQueue
{% endif %}

Numeric Comparisons:

{% if score > 80 %}
HighQualityPath
{% elif score >= 50 %}
MediumQualityPath
{% else %}
LowQualityPath
{% endif %}

String Filters:

{% if input|upper == 'APPROVED' %}
ApprovalNode
{% elif 'reject' in input|lower %}
RejectionNode
{% endif %}

Complex Conditions:

{% if ('urgent' in input|lower or priority == 'high') and status != 'completed' %}
EscalationNode
{% elif status == 'pending' and not ('hold' in input|lower) %}
ProcessingNode
{% endif %}

The Router evaluates the condition from top to bottom. When a condition matches, it returns the associated route name and execution proceeds to that node. If no conditions match, execution goes to the default outputRouter nodes can create loop structures by routing back to previous nodes. This enables iterative processing by:

Routing to an earlier node when a condition is met (e.g., counter < max_iterations)
Routing to the next node or END when the loop should exit
Using state variables to track iteration count and control loop termination

This is an alternative to Loop and Loop from Tool nodes, offering more precise control over loop conditions and execution flow.

Best Practices

Always Provide Default Output: Ensure fallback behavior for unmatched conditions to prevent pipeline failures.
Match Route Names Exactly: Route names in condition must match node IDs exactly (case-sensitive).
Order Conditions by Specificity: Place most specific conditions first to avoid unintended matches.
Use Filters for String Comparisons: Normalize strings with |lower or |upper for reliable matching.
List All Routes: Include all possible routes in the Routes list for clarity and validation.
Test All Paths: Ensure every condition path is reachable and test edge cases.
Use Descriptive Route Names: Name routes clearly to indicate their purpose (e.g., “ApprovedWorkflow” not “Path1”).
Document Complex Conditions: Add comments in YAML to explain routing logic for maintainability.
Use Router for Loop Control: When creating loops, use state variables (counters, flags) to control loop termination and prevent infinite loops.

Decision Node

The Decision Node uses LLM intelligence to make routing decisions based on natural language criteria. It operates as a standalone node in the pipeline and analyzes the input to intelligently select the appropriate output path from multiple decision outputs.

Purpose Use the Decision Node to:

Make intelligent routing decisions using LLM reasoning
Route based on natural language criteria without writing conditions
Handle complex decision logic that’s difficult to express in templates
Leverage context and semantics for routing decisions
Simplify decision-making with descriptive instructions

Decision Nodes are slower than Router nodes due to LLM processing. Use for complex routing requiring semantic understanding, not simple condition matching.

Decision nodes cannot be connected to another Decision node. If you need sequential decision-making, use a different node type (such as Router, LLM, or Code) between Decision nodes.

Parameters

Parameter	Purpose	Type Options & Examples
Input	Specify which state variables the LLM analyzes to make the routing decision	Default states: `input`, `messages` Custom states: Any defined state variables Example: `- input` `- messages` Usage: The LLM reads these state variables’ content and analyzes them against the description criteria
Description	Provide natural language instructions describing how the LLM should make routing decisions	Format: Clear, structured instructions with specific routing criteria Example: Your task is to route content based on user intent: - if user wants to publish the content, redirect to “ArticlePublisher” node - if user wants content review or moderation, redirect to “ContentModerator” node - If the request is to finish or end the process, redirect to “END” node Best Practices: Use clear criteria, specific examples, structured format
Decision Outputs (nodes)	Define the possible output paths (node IDs) the LLM can select from	Configuration: List of node IDs that the LLM can route execution to Example: `- ArticlePublisher` `- ContentModerator` How It Works: LLM analyzes input, reviews description, selects appropriate output from list
Default Output	Specify the fallback route if the LLM cannot make a confident decision	Options: Select a node ID from available nodes in the pipeline Example: `END` Fallback Behavior: If LLM can’t decide confidently, execution goes to Default Output
Interrupt Before	Pause pipeline execution before the Decision node executes	Enabled / Disabled
Interrupt After	Pause pipeline execution after the Decision node for inspection	Enabled / Disabled

YAML Configuration

state:
  input:
    type: str
    value: ''
  messages:
    type: list
entry_point: Decision 1
nodes:
  - id: Decision 1
    type: decision
    description: |
      Your task is to route content based on user intent:
      - if user wants to publish the content, redirect to "ArticlePublisher" node
      - if user wants content review or moderation, redirect to "ContentModerator" node
      - If the request is to finish or end the process, redirect to "END" node
    input:
      - input
      - messages
    nodes:
      - ArticlePublisher
      - ContentModerator
    default_output: END
  - id: ArticlePublisher
    type: toolkit
    toolkit_name: publishing_toolkit
    tool: publish_article
    input:
      - input
      - messages
    output:
      - messages
    input_mapping:
      article_content:
        type: variable
        value: input
      status:
        type: fixed
        value: published
    structured_output: false
    transition: END
  - id: ContentModerator
    type: llm
    prompt:
      type: string
      value: Review content for policy compliance and quality standards
    input:
      - input
      - messages
    output:
      - messages
    input_mapping:
      system:
        type: fixed
        value: You are a content moderator checking for policy violations and quality issues
      task:
        type: fstring
        value: 'Review this content: {input}'
      chat_history:
        type: variable
        value: messages
    structured_output: false
    transition: END

The Decision Node operates as a standalone node that uses LLM to:

Read input state variables (configured in input parameter)
Analyze description for routing criteria
Select appropriate output from nodes list
Return selected node ID for routing
If uncertain, defaults to default_output

Best Practices

Write Clear Decision Criteria: Provide specific, unambiguous routing rules with examples for each path.
Provide Examples in Description: Help the LLM understand expected routing with concrete examples.
Always Define Default Output: Provide fallback for unclear cases to prevent pipeline failures.
List All Decision Outputs: Include all possible routing targets in the nodes list.
Structure Descriptions Clearly: Use headings, lists, and clear formatting to organize routing criteria.
Use Decision Node for Complex Routing: Choose when routing requires semantic understanding, not simple condition matching.
Configure Input Variables: Include relevant state variables in input for the LLM to analyze.
Test with Various Inputs: Verify LLM routing across different scenarios and edge cases.
Monitor Decision Quality: Review LLM routing decisions periodically and refine description if needed.
Provide Context in Description: Help the LLM make better decisions by explaining the use case.
Use Descriptive Output Names: Name outputs clearly to match description (e.g., “TechnicalSupport” not “Output1”).
Use Interrupts for Debugging: Enable interrupts to review decision-making and routing results during development.

Human-in-the-Loop Node

The Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) Node pauses pipeline execution and waits for a human decision before continuing. It presents a configurable message to the user and provides up to three action buttons — Approve, Edit, and Reject — each routing to a different downstream node.

Purpose Use the HITL Node to:

Gate critical actions — require human sign-off before irreversible steps
Validate AI output — let a human review and approve content generated by previous nodes
Allow human correction — give users the ability to edit a state value before the pipeline continues
Implement approval workflows — build multi-step review processes where humans are in the decision path
Enforce compliance checkpoints — ensure sensitive operations are authorized by a person

Parameters

Parameter	Purpose	Type Options & Examples
Input	State variables available for interpolation in the User message when using F-String type	Default: `[]` Custom: Any defined state variables Example: `- summary` `- draft_content`
User Message Type	How the message presented to the user is constructed	`Fixed` - Static text Example: `"Please review the generated summary and choose an action."` `F-String` - Text with `{state_key}` placeholders resolved at runtime Example: `"Review the following draft:\n\n{summary}"` `Variable` - Entire message taken from a single state variable Example: `review_message`
User Message Value	The message content shown to the user at the interrupt point	Depends on type: - Fixed: plain text - F-String: template with `{state_key}` placeholders - Variable: name of a state variable
Approve Route	Next node when the user clicks Approve	Any registered node name or `END` Example: `publish_node`
Reject Route	Next node when the user clicks Reject	Any registered node name or `END` Example: `END`
Edit Route	Next node when the user clicks Edit	Any registered node name (cannot be `END`) Example: `regenerate_node` Requires `edit_state_key` to be set
Edit State Key	The state variable updated with the user’s edited value when the Edit action is chosen	Must match an existing state variable name Example: `summary` Required when an Edit route is configured

The Edit action is only available to users when both conditions are met:

edit_state_key is set to a valid state variable name.
Edit route is configured and does not point to END.

If either condition is missing, the Edit button will not appear in the UI.

How It Works

The node builds the user-facing message from the configured user_message.
Pipeline execution pauses using LangGraph’s dynamic interrupt mechanism.
The UI displays the message along with action buttons for each configured route.

The user chooses an action:

Action	State Change	Behavior
Approve	None	Pipeline resumes and routes to the Approve route
Reject	None	Pipeline resumes and routes to the Reject route
Edit	`edit_state_key` updated with user’s input	A text input appears; user provides the revised value, then pipeline routes to the Edit route

Execution continues from the target node.

YAML Configuration

state:
  messages:
    type: list
  input:
    type: str
  summary:
    type: str
    value: ''
entry_point: Review_summary
nodes:
  - id: Review_summary
    type: hitl
    input:
      - summary
    user_message:
      type: fstring
      value: "Please review the following summary and choose an action:\n\n{summary}"
    routes:
      approve: Publish_node
      reject: END
      edit: Regenerate_node
    edit_state_key: summary

The HITL node uses LangGraph’s Command(goto=) pattern for routing — no explicit transition field or conditional edges are needed. All route target nodes must exist in the pipeline.

UI Behavior

When the pipeline reaches a HITL node during a run, the chat panel displays the configured user message and action buttons for each configured route. Only buttons with valid routes appear. After the user clicks an action, the pipeline resumes automatically. Approve Appears when: the approve route is configured.

The Approve button signals that the user accepts the content or action as-is. Clicking it immediately resumes the pipeline and routes execution to the node specified in approve. No state variables are modified — the pipeline continues with the same state it had when it paused.

Use this when: the generated output is correct and ready for the next step (e.g., publishing content, creating a ticket, sending a notification). Edit Appears when: both an edit route and a valid edit_state_key are configured (and the Edit route does not point to END).

The Edit button allows the user to revise a specific piece of content before the pipeline continues. Clicking it opens a text input field pre-filled with (or adjacent to) the current value of the edit_state_key state variable. After the user submits the revised text, the pipeline updates edit_state_key with the new value and routes execution to the node specified in edit.

Use this when: the output is mostly correct but needs minor adjustments — for example, rewording a ticket description or correcting a generated summary — without restarting the full generation process. Reject Appears when: the reject route is configured.

The Reject button (red) signals that the user has declined the content or action entirely. Clicking it resumes the pipeline and routes execution to the node specified in reject — typically END to cancel the workflow, or a regeneration node to start over. No state variables are modified.

Use this when: the output is unacceptable and the pipeline should be stopped or fully restarted rather than edited inline.

The Edit route cannot point to END.
edit_state_key must be set for the Edit button to appear; it must reference a state variable that already exists.
Because HITL uses a dynamic interrupt, the pipeline must be running with checkpoint/memory support (a thread_id must be active) for the resume to work correctly.
Each HITL node can handle only one pending interrupt at a time.
The node does not modify state on Approve or Reject — only Edit mutates state.

Best Practices

1. Place HITL Before Irreversible Actions

Always gate destructive or hard-to-undo operations:✅ Good:

# HITL → review → publish to production
- id: Review_before_publish
  type: hitl
  user_message:
    type: fixed
    value: "Ready to publish. Approve to proceed, Reject to cancel."
  routes:
    approve: Publish_node
    reject: END

2. Use F-String to Show Relevant Context

Show users the content they are reviewing:✅ Good:

- id: Review_ticket
  type: hitl
  input:
    - ticket_title
    - ticket_description
  user_message:
    type: fstring
    value: |
      ## Ticket Ready for Review

      **Title:** {ticket_title}

      **Description:**
      {ticket_description}

      Approve to create the ticket, Edit to modify, or Reject to discard.
  routes:
    approve: Create_ticket
    edit: Create_ticket
    reject: END
  edit_state_key: ticket_description

3. Route Edit Back Through Processing When Needed

If the user’s edited value needs to be re-processed by an LLM, route Edit to a node earlier in the pipeline:

routes:
  approve: Publish_node
  edit: Reformat_node   # re-runs formatting with the edited value
  reject: END

4. Always Configure the Reject Route

Without a Reject route, users cannot decline an action. Set it to END or a recovery node:

routes:
  approve: Next_step
  reject: END

Real-Life Usage Examples

Example 1: Content Approval Workflow

An LLM generates a blog post draft. A human reviews it, approves it for publishing, edits the draft directly, or rejects it to trigger a full regeneration.

entry_point: Generate_draft
nodes:
  - id: Generate_draft
    type: llm
    input:
      - input
    output:
      - draft
      - messages
    structured_output: true
    transition: Review_draft
    input_mapping:
      system:
        type: fixed
        value: You are a blog writer.
      task:
        type: fstring
        value: Write a blog draft about {input}.
      chat_history:
        type: fixed
        value: []

  - id: Review_draft
    type: hitl
    input:
      - draft
    user_message:
      type: fstring
      value: "Draft ready for review:\n\n{draft}\n\nApprove to publish, Edit to revise inline, Reject to regenerate."
    routes:
      approve: Publish
      edit: Publish
      reject: Generate_draft
    edit_state_key: draft

  - id: Publish
    type: toolkit
    tool: PublishTool
    input:
      - draft
    transition: END
    input_mapping:
      content:
        type: variable
        value: draft

state:
  input:
    type: str
  messages:
    type: list
  draft:
    type: str
    value: ''

Example 2: Jira Ticket Approval Before Creation

An agent prepares a Jira ticket. A human approves, edits the description, or rejects ticket creation entirely.

entry_point: Prepare_ticket
nodes:
  - id: Prepare_ticket
    type: agent
    input:
      - input
      - project_id
    output:
      - ticket_title
      - ticket_description
      - messages
    transition: Review_ticket
    input_mapping:
      task:
        type: fstring
        value: "Prepare a Jira ticket for project {project_id} based on: {input}"
      chat_history:
        type: fixed
        value: []
    tool: JiraAgent

  - id: Review_ticket
    type: hitl
    input:
      - ticket_title
      - ticket_description
    user_message:
      type: fstring
      value: |
        ## Ticket Ready for Review

        **Title:** {ticket_title}

        **Description:**
        {ticket_description}

        Approve to create, Edit to modify the description, or Reject to cancel.
    routes:
      approve: Create_ticket
      edit: Create_ticket
      reject: END
    edit_state_key: ticket_description

  - id: Create_ticket
    type: toolkit
    tool: create_issue
    input:
      - ticket_title
      - ticket_description
      - project_id
    transition: END
    input_mapping:
      title:
        type: variable
        value: ticket_title
      description:
        type: variable
        value: ticket_description
      project:
        type: variable
        value: project_id

state:
  input:
    type: str
  messages:
    type: list
  project_id:
    type: str
    value: ''
  ticket_title:
    type: str
    value: ''
  ticket_description:
    type: str
    value: ''

Control Flow Nodes Comparison

Feature	Router Node	Decision Node	HITL Node
Purpose	Route execution based on template conditions with multiple paths	LLM-powered intelligent routing as a standalone node	Pause execution and require explicit human approval, edit, or rejection
Node Type	Independent routing node	Independent decision-making node	Independent human decision checkpoint
Decision Logic	Template-based conditions (Jinja2-like)	LLM reasoning from natural language description	Human judgment (Approve / Edit / Reject buttons)
Configuration	Condition, Routes, Input, Default Output	Input, Description, Nodes (decision outputs), Default Output	User Message, Routes (approve/reject/edit), Edit State Key
LLM Usage	No LLM	Yes (LLM analyzes and decides)	No LLM
Condition Syntax	Template syntax with filters (`{% if %}`, `	lower`,` in`)	Natural language instructions	N/A (human decides)
Input Variables	State variables for condition evaluation	State variables for LLM analysis	State variables for message interpolation
Complexity	Medium (template syntax)	Low (natural language)	Low (configure message and routes)
Flexibility	High (full template control)	Very High (LLM reasoning)	Low (fixed 3-action model)
Performance	Fast (template evaluation)	Slower (LLM overhead)	Depends on human response time
Output Definition	Routes list	Nodes list (decision outputs)	Per-action routes (approve/edit/reject)
Default Behavior	Default output if no match	Default output if LLM uncertain	Waits indefinitely until user acts
Best For	Explicit multi-path routing with known conditions	Complex routing requiring semantic understanding	Approval gates, compliance checkpoints, human validation
Use Case	Status-based routing, priority levels, keyword matching, approval checks, validation branching	Customer support routing, sentiment analysis, intent classification, context-aware decisions	Content approval before publish, Jira ticket sign-off, irreversible operation gates

When to Use Each Node

Router Node

Choose Router Node when you:

Need multiple named routes based on explicit conditions
Have condition logic you can express in Jinja2-like templates
Want fast, deterministic routing without LLM overhead
Know all possible paths and conditions upfront
Need to match keywords, compare values, or check status
Need binary or multi-branch conditional logic with if-else routing
Want to create loops by routing back to previous nodes

Example: Route tickets by priority level (critical/high/medium/low), approval status (approved/pending/rejected), validation branching (valid → ProcessPath, invalid → ErrorPath), or iterative processing with loop control.

Decision Node

Choose Decision Node when you:

Need LLM intelligence for routing decisions
Routing logic is complex, nuanced, or context-dependent
Want natural language decision criteria instead of templates
Require semantic understanding of user input or content
Template conditions are too rigid or difficult to express
Need to analyze multiple input variables simultaneously
Routing depends on understanding intent, sentiment, or meaning

Example: Customer support routing (technical/billing/general inquiries), sentiment analysis (positive/negative/neutral routing), intent classification, context-aware content moderation, or multi-factor decision making based on conversation history.

HITL Node

Choose HITL Node when you need:

A human to approve, reject, or edit pipeline output before it is acted upon
A compliance checkpoint before an irreversible operation (database write, external API call, email send)
Inline human correction of AI-generated content without restarting the pipeline
An explicit audit trail of human decisions in an automated workflow

Deprecated Control Flow Nodes

The following control flow nodes are deprecated and will be removed in a future release. Please migrate to the recommended alternatives:

Condition Node

The Condition node is deprecated and will be removed in an upcoming release.Migration: Use the Router node for expression-based routing or the Decision node for AI-powered routing decisions.Migration Guide: Condition Node Migration

Nodes Overview - Understand all available node types
Execution Nodes - Function, Tool, Code, and Custom nodes
States - Manage data flow through pipeline state
Connections - Link nodes together
YAML Configuration - See complete node syntax examples

Chat & Conversations

Indexing

Agents & Pipelines

Credentials & Toolkits

Entity Management

Router Node

Decision Node

Human-in-the-Loop Node

UI Behavior

Control Flow Nodes Comparison

When to Use Each Node

Deprecated Control Flow Nodes

Chat & Conversations

Indexing

Agents & Pipelines

Credentials & Toolkits

Entity Management

​Router Node

​Decision Node

​Human-in-the-Loop Node

​UI Behavior

​Control Flow Nodes Comparison

​When to Use Each Node

​Deprecated Control Flow Nodes

Router Node

Decision Node

Human-in-the-Loop Node

UI Behavior

Control Flow Nodes Comparison

When to Use Each Node

Deprecated Control Flow Nodes